Which is correct? A concrete example would be: These processes (are run|are ran) within the context of this container.
The second edition of Webster's New International Dictionary was published in 1934, so it would appear that the pronunciation of processes with a "long e" sound in the last syllable has been around for some time. Note that processes seems to only be pronounced with /siz/ or /siːz/ when it is a plural noun.
I was just thinking about this when I typed out "processes" and realized that I've heard it pronounced both "process-izz" and "process-eez". Is one incorrect, or is it considered an accent thing, ...
0 This is a matter of context and semantics. Do you use a single process to perform all of your projects? Then the second is correct. Differing processes to perform each task would indicate that the first is correct.
A question concerning capitalisation to calrify ambiguity as I've seen the words variously capitalized. Should the names of methods, processes or roles be capitalized? ( f. ex. Agile method, Sprint
grammar - Processes "are run" vs. "are ran" - English Language & Usage ...
13 Is there any difference between "processor" and "processer"? Some spelling dictionaries only have the -or form, and some have both. Is it a US vs UK English thing? Or something else? More specifically, is a computer algorithm that processes orders better called an OrderProcessor or an OrderProcesser?
We often see "spawn xx processes". The definition of spawn as a verb is 1. (of a fish, frog, mollusk, crustacean, etc.) release or deposit eggs. "the fish spawn among fine-leaved plants" (of a fish, frog, etc.) be laid as eggs. 2. of a person) produce (offspring). "why had she married a man who could spawn a boy like that?"